Hey There! Before You Go. 😧
Get the best vintage content straight into your inbox!

Don't worry, we don't spam

The Old Public Library Of Cincinnati Before It Was Demolished In 1955

Before a parking garage occupied the corner of 629 Vine Street in Downtown Cincinnati, one of the most visually stunning public libraries in the entire country stood in its place. Built in 1874, the Cincinnati Public Library was a grand, cast-iron and marble structure that could hold up to 300,000 books in its collection. It cost $383,594.53 to construct — roughly $7 million in today’s money — and every dollar of that showed in the building’s extraordinary interior.

The library rose on a site originally reserved for an opera house. That project went bankrupt before it ever got off the ground, and architect J.W. McLaughlin stepped in to design something entirely different in its place. The exterior of the finished building was modest — even plain by some accounts. But the inside was another world entirely.

Completed in 1874, originally intended to be an opera house before the project went bankrupt, the modestly-sized building did not do justice to to the magnitude and beauty of the interior designed by architect J.W. McLaughlin.
Completed in 1874, originally intended to be an opera house before the project went bankrupt, the modestly-sized building did not do justice to to the magnitude and beauty of the interior designed by architect J.W. McLaughlin.

The Main Hall was the centerpiece of McLaughlin’s design. Five tiers of cast-iron shelving climbed the walls, each level accessible by walkways that wrapped around the open central atrium. A skylight ceiling flooded the space with natural light, and shafts of sunlight cut through the tall windows to illuminate the checkerboard marble floors below. The foyer was equally striking, welcoming visitors into a space that felt more like a cathedral than a city library.

One of the large cast-iron book alcoves that lined the Main Hall.
One of the large cast-iron book alcoves that lined the Main Hall.

Each cast-iron alcove along the Main Hall held rows of books, organized and packed tightly into the shelving that framed every wall. The structure of the building was itself a feat of Victorian-era design — the iron framework served both a functional and decorative purpose, giving the library its signature layered appearance when viewed from the ground floor looking up.

The Old Main in an early picture.
The Old Main in an early picture.
A glimpse of the Main Hall can be seen through vestibule.
A glimpse of the Main Hall can be seen through vestibule.

From the very beginning, the library was a busy place. Readers came from across the city to use its reading rooms, browse its stacks, and take advantage of its growing collection. The Newspaper Room, photographed around 1899, was one of the most well-used spaces in the building — a long, orderly room where patrons could read the day’s papers under the library’s ample lighting.

The Newspaper Room (photo circa 1899).
The Newspaper Room (photo circa 1899).
People reading books.
People reading books.

The Main Hall drew visitors into its open atrium, where the full scale of the five-tiered shelving system became immediately clear. Looking across the hall from any level, you could see readers at tables below, librarians moving between the stacks, and the skylight ceiling casting a soft, even glow over everything. The space was designed to be functional, but it was impossible to be inside it without noticing its beauty.

Another view of the hall.
Another view of the hall.
Children inside the Old Main.
Children inside the Old Main.

Children were a regular presence in the library. The building served all of Cincinnati’s residents, and photographs from the era show young readers sitting at tables, surrounded by the towering iron bookshelves. Looking down from the upper tiers, the reading area below appears remarkably organized — rows of tables filled with patrons, all set against the backdrop of the marble floor and the open atrium above them.

Looking down at the reading area in the Main Hall.
Looking down at the reading area in the Main Hall.

As decades passed, the library’s ability to serve its growing community began to strain against the building’s physical limits. The collection expanded well beyond what the shelves could comfortably hold. Books were stacked beyond easy reach, and the layout that had once felt spacious became crowded and difficult to navigate. The building itself was also deteriorating. The ventilation system was failing, water leaks had developed, paint was peeling from the walls, and cracks had appeared in the structure. The cost of repairing these safety issues was deemed too high to justify.

Over the years the library wasn't able to accommodate all the readers.
Over the years the library wasn’t able to accommodate all the readers.
The library's main entrance.
The library’s main entrance.

Three decorative heads had long guarded the library’s main entrance, carved into the stone above the doors. They became some of the most recognized features of the building’s exterior. When the decision was made to close and demolish the old library, these three heads were the only original architectural elements preserved. They were relocated to the garden of the new library building that opened in January 1955 at 800 Vine Street.

The welcoming booth.
The welcoming booth.
Readers.
Readers.

The new library at 800 Vine Street was contemporary in style — a sharp contrast to the ornate Victorian design of the old building. Once the collection and staff had been moved to the new location, the old building at 629 Vine Street was sold to the Leyman Corporation. By June 1955, the structure was torn down. The lot was converted into a parking garage, which stands on the site today.

This photo of the Main Hall was taken about a year before the building was closed.
This photo of the Main Hall was taken about a year before the building was closed.

The photographs taken inside the Main Hall in its final years show a space that, despite the building’s problems, still looked remarkable. The five tiers of cast-iron alcoves housing over 200,000 books remained intact. Readers still filled the tables on the ground floor. The skylight still cast its light across the marble below. Nothing in these images suggests the building was months away from being sold and demolished.

The Main Hall featured five tiers of cast-iron alcoves that housed over 200,000 books.
The Main Hall featured five tiers of cast-iron alcoves that housed over 200,000 books.
Young readers.
Young readers.

These historical photographs are some of the only records of what the interior of the old Cincinnati Public Library actually looked like in daily use. They show ordinary people — adults, children, students — sitting inside one of the most architecturally remarkable public buildings their city ever produced. The images below offer a direct look at the library as it existed before it was gone for good.

The beautiful main hall.
The beautiful main hall.
Young readers.
Young readers.
Enjoyed this post? Get new ones in your inbox.

57 thoughts on “The Old Public Library Of Cincinnati Before It Was Demolished In 1955”

    1. During a service stairway while storing pipe, I once walked down a stairway with railings about knee height. There’s nothing like a railing that creates tripping hazards.

      1. Yes, I believe they do. There are tons of old books and photos displayed in the south building, as well as large areas of the library for 3D printing. From lower levels, you can see huge archives full of books on the top floors.

    1. Unfortunately, the style was changed after the first idiot leaned over too far to take a selfie. It’s a great style, but people can’t be trusted to follow safe practices. Anything over an 8 foot fall and you have to be tied off with a harness. Despite the railing

    1. The building was falling apart and couldn’t be used effectively for its intended purpose. In many cases, old buildings are not suitable for modern use and are expensive to maintain and update. Who’s going to foot the bill? Our country has an awful lot of aging, pretty buildings, and the older it grows, the more there will be. Although I understand that we want to preserve some links to our past, if we keep every crumbling old building with some architectural flourish, our cities will quickly become crowded with dilapidated ruins. Buildings cannot be moved or digitized the way books can, and real estate is a finite resource. Structures need to be able to be torn down and replaced in cities. Keeping, preserving, and repurposing a (very) few is possible. We may only be able to preserve the rest in the form of pictures, maps/plans, and records written by humans.

    1. This is a great analogy for how humanity is doing. The things people liked were becoming increasingly old, delapidated, expensive, too small, and unsafe. Despite the sticks-in-the-mud, eventually a new building was constructed to meet the needs of those who work in and use the library. In the present day, a bunch of whiny idiots on the internet are ranting about how great it used to be and how we shouldn’t have made the change because they think the old building was beautiful. Even though it was a pain to work there, the building failed to fulfill its stated purpose (the collection had outgrown the space), and it was overly expensive to maintain. The rose tint of nostalgia often prevents us from seeing when it’s time for something new. Occasionally, though, we overcome that intransigence and move forward. Internet users only focus on nostalgia and moan endlessly about a past that was never what they remember it to be. The human race.

  1. Libraries were being marked up for automated shelving and retrieval systems, and my college town’s library bought one maybe 40 years ago. It was made by a company that went out of business. They had to hire blacksmiths to make replacement parts before trashing it.

  2. This shit we do in America makes me sick. Tiger’s Stadium was torn down, and that was the worst. This history has become another nondescript patch of grass in Detroit, which is so sad to see.

  3. It doesn’t seem safe or efficient, no matter how impressive these shelving systems are! Shifting shelves with five or more stacks is difficult enough. However, it’s quite beautiful.

    1. In my experience, many preservationists are quicker to protest than to pledge money and raise funds for the purchase of a historic property. It is unclear what the details were for this building, but many of these folks wait for other people or their local governments to provide the funds. That’s not how the game works. Even historically significant properties are subject to market rules.

  4. Cincinnati was one of the first cities to provide a truly public library, supported by tax dollars. It was also the first American city to open its library facilities on Sundays and the first to provide services for the blind. Additionally, Cincinnati Public Library was one of the first to provide young people with access to the facilities and check out books in the early 20th century, along with a system of youth-focused areas. In terms of the library, it was built in 1874 on the West Side of Cincinnati and served as the main branch for roughly 75 years. The main library in Cincinnati has always been on the progressive side of the public library system, so it’s not surprising that it was torn down to make way for a larger, more modern building. When it was built, the building was considered very modern. By the 1920s, the library had outgrown its building, which had central heating and an elevator. In 1955, a new library was built instead of replacing the old one, due to legal and financial issues. When it was demolished, the old building was overcrowded and neglected, and a new building had been overdue for 30+ years. Yea, nothing too dramatic, it was basically just torn down for the sake of progress. Let me know if this helps. Please feel free to ask any questions you may have. At the museum center at Union Terminal, my brother works in the Cincinnati history department.

  5. This new library is more accessible to more people, but this picture makes me sad that it was torn down. The corner would have been the perfect place for me to build a fort and live. Books are just my thing.

    1. Could have been renovated, or repurposed with a new library built elsewhere. It’s sickening to destroy such a generation in the name of “progress.” If they were going to do it, I wish they would have done it in the 20s or 30s. The current library building is a piece of modernist crap. Even so, it serves as the heart of a library system that frequently wins national awards for its work as a library.

    1. I remember my father purchasing the first commercially available handheld calculator for arithmetic only. In 1970, it was the size and weight of a brick, and cost $300. The technological advances in that relatively short time have been astounding. But…I can’t help but love books. In my house, they’re stacked floor to ceiling, and I buy and read more almost weekly.

    1. My feelings were the same when I read about the World’s Columbian Exposition of 1893 and the subsequent demolition of Chicago’s White City. What a waste of good architecture. If they had preserved it, I’m sure it would have become a heritage site

      1. Asbestos probably wasn’t even present. In 1874, it was just on the cusp of large-scale asbestos production, which was mainly occurring in other countries at the time. They just let this beautiful building fall into disrepair and didn’t care enough to maintain or preserve it.

  6. While it looks pretty and visually stunning, I bet it was a logistical nightmare for people trying to find their books or put them away. If you were trapped at the end of the aisle during a fire, you would be screwed.

  7. According to the title, they just got rid of the library. All the books were moved to a new building a short distance away. the building in this picture was very old and wasn’t safe.

  8. The building was originally built as a theater and the iron shelves were added after it was converted into a library. The library eventually outgrew the building and a purpose-built library was built nearby. There is no denying that it was a tragic loss, but it wasn’t completely pointless. Today, Macy’s occupies the site of the old library. Parking is not available there, as stated in the title.

    1. In retrospect, it’s not so tragic. Cincinnati’s public library system remains one of the best in the country. It may look impressive, but a massive pile of books is unsafe, poorly organized, and wasteful. They could have put in twice as many books if they had built actual floors under those shelves.

    1. The current library is downtown and it’s amazing. A beautiful building with multiple floors and a rare book archive. Although I’m not sure, I’d imagine the books were transferred to the new library.

  9. That’s why we can’t have nice things! This type of building would have been maintained or restored in many parts of Europe so that future generations could enjoy them. If it’s not broken, don’t fix it. Every century or so, we like to erase the blackboard in the States. Of course, not every old structure can be saved for practical reasons, but yeah. Oh, and I was fighting myself not to spell broke baroque. I appreciate you making that joke, Beauty and the Beast.

  10. Architecture from the Victorian era is absolutely beautiful; it is so sad that most buildings today lack beauty and character (apart from a few rarities). There are more idiots today than back then, they would just fall off the railings if you did something like this today

    1. The neoclassical style was disliked by many architecture snobs at the time because it was considered a cheap copy of classical architecture. They had no idea how ugly the 20th century could be!

    2. Beauty lies in the eye of the beholder. I prefer modern architecture with clean lines and minimal design over stuffy, washed out Victorian architecture. Even before we talk about the use and efficiency benefits of modern architecture, that’s just the aesthetics. In addition, there was a lot of crap built in the Victorian era that would make today’s shoddiest construction look good. Since we are quite a few years out of the Victorian era, most of the garbage has been washed away by time. When you listen to a best of album, you declare that the band has never had a bad song. People definitely died from accidents like falling off railings way more back then, we just didn’t care because people died from everything. Even moderately large construction projects used to have an estimated death toll due to poor safety procedures. Only a few people died during a large construction project.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Share this Post 🥺

Please take a moment to share this content. Your support is greatly appreciated! 🙌🙏

Share this Post 🥺

Please take a moment to share this content. Your support is greatly appreciated! 🙌🙏
Scroll to Top
 
Hey Friend, Before You Go.. Please like & follow for more interesting content